Open source · Identity & SSO

Open-source identity & sso

There are 5 open-source identity & sso worth knowing about, led by Keycloak and Authentik. They are most often used to replace Okta, Auth0. All can be self-hosted, which removes per-seat pricing entirely — but only pays off if someone on your side will own updates, backups and security patches.

Reviewed 2026-07-28 How we compare Full catalog

The projects

ProjectWhat it isCommonly replacesSource
Keycloak The open-source standard for self-hosted SSO, backed by Red Hat. Okta Auth0 repo ↗
Authentik Modern self-hosted identity provider, friendlier than Keycloak. Okta Auth0 repo ↗
Zitadel Open-source identity with multi-tenancy and a managed cloud. Okta Auth0 repo ↗
SuperTokens Open-source authentication built for developers to embed. Auth0 repo ↗
Ory Open-source identity and access infrastructure. Auth0 Okta repo ↗

Don't self-host if…

We list these because they are often the right answer. We say this because they are not always the right answer.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best open-source identity?

Keycloak is the most widely deployed of the 5 projects here — the open-source standard for self-hosted sso, backed by red hat. The honest answer depends less on features than on operations: the best one is whichever your team will actually keep patched and backed up.

Are open-source identity & sso really free?

The software is free; running it is not. Budget roughly $5–20 a month for a small server, plus your own time for updates, backups and security patching. You are swapping a subscription for maintenance work, which is a good trade only if someone will actually do the work.

Can I self-host without a sysadmin?

Often yes, with Docker and a managed VPS. Several of these projects also sell a hosted version, which keeps the open-source licence and data-ownership benefits without the maintenance burden — at that point you are comparing their price against the commercial incumbent's.

Is open source safe for business use?

Widely deployed open-source software is not inherently less secure — the code is inspectable, which is an advantage. The genuine risk is operational: an unpatched self-hosted service facing the internet is far more dangerous than a maintained SaaS product. Security depends on your discipline, not the licence.