Open source · Containers & runtimes

Open-source containers & runtimes

There are 5 open-source containers & runtimes worth knowing about, led by Podman and containerd. They are most often used to replace Docker. All can be self-hosted, which removes per-seat pricing entirely — but only pays off if someone on your side will own updates, backups and security patches.

Reviewed 2026-07-28 All open-source alternatives How we compare Full catalog

The projects

ProjectWhat it isCommonly replacesSource
Podman Daemonless, rootless containers with a Docker-compatible CLI. Docker repo ↗
containerd The runtime Docker and Kubernetes actually use underneath. Docker repo ↗
Incus System containers and VMs; a community fork of LXD. Docker repo ↗
Buildah Builds OCI images without a daemon or a Dockerfile. Docker repo ↗
Colima Container runtimes on macOS without Docker Desktop's licence. Docker repo ↗

Don't self-host if…

We list these because they are often the right answer. We say this because they are not always the right answer.

Questions people actually ask

What is the best open-source container?

Podman is the most widely deployed of the 5 projects here — daemonless, rootless containers with a docker-compatible cli. The honest answer depends less on features than on operations: the best one is whichever your team will actually keep patched and backed up.

Are open-source containers & runtimes really free?

The software is free; running it is not. Budget roughly $5–20 a month for a small server, plus your own time for updates, backups and security patching. You are swapping a subscription for maintenance work, which is a good trade only if someone will actually do the work.

Can I self-host without a sysadmin?

Often yes, with Docker and a managed VPS. Several of these projects also sell a hosted version, which keeps the open-source licence and data-ownership benefits without the maintenance burden — at that point you are comparing their price against the commercial incumbent's.

Is open source safe for business use?

Widely deployed open-source software is not inherently less secure — the code is inspectable, which is an advantage. The genuine risk is operational: an unpatched self-hosted service facing the internet is far more dangerous than a maintained SaaS product. Security depends on your discipline, not the licence.

Other open-source roundups